Listen Live
WERE AM Mobile App 2020

LISTEN LIVE. LIKE US ON FACEBOOK. FOLLOW US ON TWITTER

News Talk Cleveland Featured Video
CLOSE

The U.S. censors Al Jazeera for no good reason.

by Wadah Khanfar

As I write, a ticker flashes across my screen reporting that our Cairo bureau has been stormed, our offices closed, and our equipment confiscated. It’s another hurdle in a fast-growing list of obstacles to prevent Al Jazeera’s coverage in Egypt, where we have more reporters, cameras, and citizens’ feeds on the ground than any other international network.

On Thursday three of our journalists were arrested. The next morning one of our websites was hacked. All week the Egyptian government-owned satellite company Nilesat blocked our broadcast signal.

Undeterred, our teams fanned out across the country. Braving the same violent pro-government attacks waged on demonstrators, Al Jazeera journalists took their cameras to the streets of Cairo, Suez, Alexandria, and Malhalla to capture the dramatic scenes of thousands of everyday Egyptians struggling for greater representation. In parallel, scores of citizens equipped with mobile phones, Twitter, and Facebook fed us real-time images and updates from the street. Social-media platforms have become an integral part of our coverage. The regime’s response? It turned the Internet off, too. There’s no doubt about intent: Cairo wants to deny our ability to inform the world of these remarkable events as they unfold.

Staring down governments that want to monopolize information in the Arab world, however, is hardly new to Al Jazeera. At this moment, though, I question whether this is exactly what has also happened to Al Jazeera English in America. There, too, we are almost completely shut out.

That’s quite concerning, as the U.S. media market rests on sturdy democratic principles, namely the First Amendment and the freedom of expression. But ever since Al Jazeera’s English channel first sought to broadcast in the States, roadblocks have marked every turn.

In the late 1990s, Al Jazeera’s Arabic channel emerged as a transformational force in the Middle East. It gave a voice to the Arab street: intellectuals and marginalized political opposition were heard, in many cases, for the first time. A free press may be a familiar reality in the West, but where I live the concept of an independent news channel was truly revolutionary.

Soon after, the Bush administration was intent on promoting democracy across the Middle East. But as it waged wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, it also sought to filter the information flowing to the American people. Washington’s “with us or against us” mentality, regrettably, quickly demonized Al Jazeera for daring to provide alternative viewpoints on wars that had, to put it bluntly, been sanitized for American audiences. Already famous in the Middle East for telling both sides of the story, Al Jazeera was not about to compromise its professional standards and ignore the human realities of war on the ground.

What stunned us then, as it does today, is the insistence by U.S. operators that Americans are not interested. From a commercial standpoint, they argued, Al Jazeera was not worth their precious bandwidth. Our figures prove otherwise. In recent days, our online viewership has spiked by 2,500 percent. And more than half of those eyeballs are coming from the U.S.!

Read More

Story Compliments Of Newsweek.com